rose_griffes (
rose_griffes) wrote2021-11-08 07:10 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
stealing trees
I almost dug up a baby tree the other day. It was at the edge of some soon-to-be-developed property, so I knew it wasn't going to be long before it was bulldozed. But after double-checking the leaf shape when I got home, it turns out I was mistaken about the tree species.
Aside from almost-guerrilla gardening, I've been to the movies. Dune was... weighty. Which is both good and bad. Overall I did feel positive about it, but dang, Denis Villeneuve, maybe lighten up a little? Just a smidge? That two and a half hours felt longer than it was, in part because there's ZERO levity.
The cast was spectacular, the movie looked awesome, and the story was apparently pretty faithful to the source material. But also, it was half of a book, which leads to an incomplete narrative. That's a REALLY long movie to have only half of a story.
I agreed with most of this review, which also had this hilarious and spot-on description of the movie's lead: "I have also barely mentioned Chalamet, and that’s because I believe very strongly that if you have nothing bad to say about a malnourished chap who spells Timothy with two e’s, you should say nothing at all."
So have you seen it? What did you think?
Aside from almost-guerrilla gardening, I've been to the movies. Dune was... weighty. Which is both good and bad. Overall I did feel positive about it, but dang, Denis Villeneuve, maybe lighten up a little? Just a smidge? That two and a half hours felt longer than it was, in part because there's ZERO levity.
The cast was spectacular, the movie looked awesome, and the story was apparently pretty faithful to the source material. But also, it was half of a book, which leads to an incomplete narrative. That's a REALLY long movie to have only half of a story.
I agreed with most of this review, which also had this hilarious and spot-on description of the movie's lead: "I have also barely mentioned Chalamet, and that’s because I believe very strongly that if you have nothing bad to say about a malnourished chap who spells Timothy with two e’s, you should say nothing at all."
So have you seen it? What did you think?
no subject
I agree it was very dark, but then so is the book. There is really no humor to speak of in the novel, at least none that I remember. And it's an accurate adaptation. Lynch's 1984 film version goes for...some, disturbing humor, which I guess is in the book. But Villeneuve avoids that.
I also saw it on my television set with the sound turned way up...so didn't really get the same effect of the sound that you did or the visuals. (I'm not ready to go to movie theaters yet - I live in NYC.) Although I'm not sure I care - because the visuals are rather dark and not exactly visuals I want to see in a movie theater ...
Although, good news.. Dune Part II has officially been greenlit and will start filming in 2022
Just days after the first installment of Dune hit theaters and a successful box office opening weekend, Dune: Part Two has been officially greenlit. Releasing simultaneously in theaters and on streaming service HBO Max, Dune earned Warner Bros.’s largest opening weekend box office of 2021 with $40M in the United States. This resulted in the swift announcement that Dune: Part Two’s release date is set for October 20, 2023, nearly two years to the day after its predecessor.
I actually thought it ended in a good place - with them escaping into the desert. If the films ended there - it wouldn't be a bad thing necessarily. And that is Dune Book 1 in the novel. The novel is split into three books. Book 1, Book 2, and Book 3.
no subject
Agreed that the film ended in a reasonable place for a two-parter.
no subject
I thought he was doing a three-parter, but apparently not. I don't remember enough of the books to really comment on them.
no subject
The first book is so dense, cramming it into a 2 and 1/2 hour movie would be messy. Splitting the film into 2 parts is a wise choice. I did like that in Denis Villeneuve’s version, the set up of the characters, lore, and politics in the story was clearer than in the book.
I’m curious on how the second and third book will be adapted into films, let alone screenplays because the story goes off the rails.
no subject
no subject
no subject